天天5g天天爽人妻熟女,熟妇多毛,无码aaaaa,国产熟女高潮

很抱歉,您尚未登錄!
VIP會員登陸后可以查閱當前板塊內容,請登陸后查看!
請點擊登錄

  • TOP
  • 手機版
    全部提示消息

    易之家外貿SNS社區(qū) Tradesns foreign trade community
    當前所在頁面位置: 首頁 > 貿易博文 > Apple Products Designed By 15 People At A Kitchen Table?
    文章作者
    HaoLara
    關 注
    加 好 友
    站 內 消 息
    作者文章精選
    Listen to yourself
    查看更多>
    Apple Products Designed By 15 People At A Kitchen Table?
    瀏覽量:214 | 回復:0 | 發(fā)布時間:2012-08-09 14:47:22

    Testimony during the ongoing legal battle between Samsung and Apple has revealed that the two companies have very different product development styles. Whereas Samsung employs over 1, 000 people to help design its wares, Apple leaves its design decisions to a handful of engineers who meet weekly around a kitchen table.

    The 15 industrial designers Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) employs come from the U.S., U.K., Australia and Japan. It was in these pow-wows that products such as the iPhone and iPad were designed.

    According to an Apple engineer, the small group of engineers is headed by Sir Jonathan Ive.

    And why shouldn’t big decisions be made by a small group of thoughtful, committed tech designers? Indeed, there is something to be said for having feedback from a great number of smart people – less of a possibility that certain details might fall through the cracks, etc. – but a large number of decision makers submitting input and opinion can both slow down the process of coming to a final design for production, and weigh the product down with too many features in the hope of making everybody happy or trying to think of everything. Think about your local diner: there are many things on the menu, sure, and some of them are pretty good (always go with breakfast at a diner) but how many of the items are really great?

    Another positive aspect of a smaller, more manageable team is that conflicts are there, out in the open. There is no possibility of hiding amongst the crowd, forming cliques that can stymie teamwork and ultimately be destructive to the group’s overall goal.

    A smaller team also makes it possible for a leader to look into the eyes of everyone that reports to him/her and see whether the understanding is there, that all the pieces of a task are coming together and everyone is on the same page. Great teams are packed with individuals who are focused on moving forward and breaking new ground. That’s a fantastic thing, but the end goal has to be the aim and the leader’s job is to keep the boat going in the right direction while setting priorities.

    What are some other upsides or downsides of having a lean and mean design or business team? Do smaller teams, like the one working on Apple’s products, put themselves at any kind of risk by limiting their numbers?

    關 注 (0
    評 論(0)
    分 享
    熱門
    相關
    出口印尼必看!清關紅燈期的風險與防范
    作者
    易之家
    回復:0 | 發(fā)布時間:2025-01-07 15:57:05
    全面“圍堵”!美國再拉黑多家中企
    作者
    易之家
    回復:0 | 發(fā)布時間:2025-01-10 15:58:54
    解析2024外貿“成績單”,解鎖中國經濟發(fā)展亮色
    作者
    易之家
    回復:0 | 發(fā)布時間:2025-01-14 17:33:20
    山水相依,互惠共贏!中國東盟經貿合作前景廣闊
    作者
    易之家
    回復:0 | 發(fā)布時間:2025-01-17 16:18:40
    恒訊科技分析:跨境網絡節(jié)點怎么選能降低成本?
    作者
    張denny
    回復:0 | 發(fā)布時間:2025-01-08 12:55:41
    重磅!特朗普就職后,或100天內訪華,還有這些動作值得關注
    作者
    易之家
    回復:0 | 發(fā)布時間:2025-01-22 09:04:48